Columbia University agrees to Trump demands in effort to restore federal funding

Columbia University has agreed to a list of demands by the Trump administration in order to start negotiations on restoring $400 million in federal funding that was stripped from the university earlier this month.

The Trump administration canceled the university’s federal grants on March 7, accusing the New York school of “inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.” The abrupt cancellation of funds will end dozens, if not hundreds, of the university’s cutting edge, medical and scientific research projects.

But last week, the administration sent a letter to the university laying out nine demands that Columbia needed to accept by Thursday “as a precondition” to potentially restore funds and save the research.

On Friday, the university’s interim president, Katrina Armstrong, announced that the school has responded and outlined its progress to “ensure uninterrupted academic activities.”

“We have much to be proud of as a community, and it has been a privilege to share our progress and plans,” she said in a statement. “In the spirit of great American universities, we expect Columbians to engage in robust debate and discussion about our way forward, and we welcome it as an opportunity to shape the future of Columbia.”

The negotiations between the Trump administration and one of the nation’s oldest and most prestigious universities represents an unprecedented attempt by federal officials to leverage the affairs of higher education in the U.S.

The demands include implementing a mask ban, completing “disciplinary proceedings” for some student protesters, formalizing a definition of antisemitism, reforming admissions, installing an outsider to head its Middle East, South Asian and African Studies department for a minimum of five years.

The administration also called for “long-term structural changes” and expects the Ivy League school to sort it out at a later date.

It is not immediately clear how many and to what degree Columbia agreed with the administration’s requests.

On Thursday, a student-led group that organizes and leads the school’s protests, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, slammed the notion of Columbia striking a deal with the Trump administration.

“Columbia’s refusal to divest from, and even doubling down on, the genocide of the Palestinian people these past 17 months has made its expected response to the Trump Administration’s ransom note incredibly clear,” the group wrote on Instagram. “Columbia has no intention of defending its students or faculty from the government’s crackdown on Palestinian activism, instead it actively joins hands with the fascist state to sell out its community.”

On Thursday, 41 of the roughly 100 members of the university’s history department warned the university against allowing the administration to interfere in its policy. They compared the administration’s actions to attempts by “authoritarian regimes” to seek control over independent academic institutions.

“Such interventions jeopardize our ability to think honestly about the past, the present, and the future, and to do so with our students, who deserve every opportunity to learn and to think for themselves,” the history department members wrote. “Should this control be realized, here or elsewhere, it would make any real historical scholarship, teaching, and intellectual community impossible.”

The Trump administration’s demands are the latest hit for the Ivy League school, seen as the epicenter of student-led, pro-Palestinian demonstrations that eventually overtook life at college campuses across the nation.

The protests were prompted by the Israeli government’s fierce response to the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attacks, which has killed nearly 50,000 people living in Gaza and displaced millions. Student activists staged the demonstrations in an attempt to get their universities to divest from companies linked to the Israeli government.

For weeks last spring, Columbia students staged daily protests, established an encampment of several dozen tents on university lawns and at one point, occupied a university building. Dozens of students were arrested in the demonstrations that regularly featured controversial political slogans, including “from the river to the sea,” which some criticized as antisemitic.

Some Jewish students joined the protesters on college campuses, while others said they felt like the demonstrations were hateful. Several Jewish students also reported being assaulted at several universities.

Allie Wong, a PhD student who was arrested while protesting on campus in April of last year, said that while the protests were divisive, she believes the challenges facing Columbia unite students on a common cause.

“In terms of student response, I think that you’re actually going to have many more students involved in this, because it is no longer, you know, divestment, Israel, Palestine. It’s about all these other things,” she said, referring to democracy and freedom of speech. “And I would argue, there is no group on campus that these issues do not reach.”

The threats to federal funding followed the Justice Department’s launch in February of a task force to “root out” what it calls “anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses.“

Amid the negotiations over the grants, federal immigration officials apprehended at least two Columbia students who participated in the student-led protest, including 30-year-old Mahmoud Khalil. A doctoral student from India, Ranjani Srinivasan, also fled to Canada after her student visa was revoked.

Mohammad Hemeida, who chairs Columbia’s student governing board, said he hopes that by allowing the Trump administration to declare a victory, immigration officials will lay off students.

“The look of Columbia bowing down is not good,” he said. “But what I’m worried about mostly is students being targeted and I feel like they’ve used that as a tactic to pressure the institution.”

The arrests prompted new protests on campus and raised concerns nationwide about the federal government’s infringement on free speech.

The university’s journalism school described the apprehensions as “witnessing and experiencing an alarming chill.”

“One does not have to agree with the political opinions of any particular individual to understand that these threats cut to the core of what it means to live in a pluralistic democracy,” the journalism school said in a Friday statement. “The use of deportation to suppress foreign critics runs parallel to an aggressive campaign to use libel laws in novel — even outlandish ways — to silence or intimidate the independent press.”

Columbia students are on their spring break and will return to campus next week.